Filter Bubble / Inequality Theme

 

 

What is a Filter Bubble?

Ted Talk by author Eli Parsiser

https://www.ted.com/talks/eli_pariser_beware_online_filter_bubbles?language=en#t-4291

 

 

What are artists doing to try to break through media filter bubbles to reveal inequalities of power, money, and attention?

Natalie Jerejimenko’s Feral Robotic Dogs: http://inhabitat.com/robotic-pollution-sniffing-eco-dogs/

 

And her MEXICO CITY  BIKExMESSENGERS

Local media, very local media, coproduced to change who, where, how and why news is produced. Public information updating as you ride; economic statistics, like the extent of student debt, in the form of “occu-pie” charts – thereby enabling you to transform your bike into a moving civic media display. Unlike paid advertisement displayed in public transit, this indicator, and the ones to follow, are in the interests of the rider and in all our interests. http://www.environmentalhealthclinic.net/portfolio_page/bike-messenger/

 

Yes Men making a historical tragedy visible in the news. Revealing the inequalities between corporations/people, rich countries/poor countries:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiWlvBro9eIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiWlvBro9eI

 

20 Artworks Inspired by the Occupy Wall Street Movement

http://flavorwire.com/233362/20-artworks-inspired-by-the-occupy-wall-street-movement

 

Occupy George dollar bill stamping: http://www.occupygeorge.com/

 

Banksy: https://www.google.com/search?q=banksy&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj03v7pnorQAhUJwYMKHabBAtAQ_AUICCgB&biw=1183&bih=726

 

 

On the Authority of images and the collective reclaiming:

“Ways of Something”, is a contemporary remake of John Berger’s BBC documentary, “Ways of Seeing” (1972). Compiled by Lorna Mills, the first episode consists of one-minute videos by 30 web-based artists who commonly work with 3D rendering, gifs, film remix, webcam performances, and websites to describe the cacophonous conditions of artmaking after the internet. https://vimeo.com/105731173

 

http://15folds.com/

 

 

Are humans less valuable than their own images?

 

Hito Steyerl: Theorist/artist addressing the proliferation of images and how they inscribe and affect economy and culture on both a macro and micro scale. “Images do not represent reality, they create reality, they are second nature,” Steyerl has said.

 

Factory of the Sun video clip:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyqqiELBDZM

 

 

 “A while ago I met an extremely interesting developer in Holland. He was working on smart phone camera technology. A representational mode of thinking photography is: there is something out there and it will be represented by means of optical technology ideally via indexical link. But the technology for the phone camera is quite different. As the lenses are tiny and basically crap, about half of the data captured by the sensor are noise. The trick is to create the algorithm to clean the picture from the noise, or rather to define the picture from within noise. But how does the camera know this? Very simple. It scans all other pictures stored on the phone or on your social media networks and sifts through your contacts. It looks through the pictures you already made, or those that are networked to you and tries to match faces and shapes. In short: it creates the picture based on earlier pictures, on your/its memory. It does not only know what you saw but also what you might like to see based on your previous choices. In other words, it speculates on your preferences and offers an interpretation of data based on affinities to other data. The link to the thing in front of the lens is still there, but there are also links to past pictures that help create the picture. You don’t really photograph the present, as the past is woven into it.

 

The result might be a picture that never existed in reality, but that the phone thinks you might like to see. It is a bet, a gamble, some combination between repeating those things you have already seen and coming up with new versions of these, a mixture of conservatism and fabulation. The paradigm of representation stands to the present condition as traditional lens-based photography does to an algorithmic, networked photography that works with probabilities and bets on inertia. Consequently, it makes seeing unforeseen things more difficult.”

http://dismagazine.com/uploads/2014/05/k7x11f9.jpg

“In Art and Money, William Goetzmann, Luc Renneboog, and Christophe Spaenjers conclude that income inequality correlates to art prices. The bigger the difference between top income and no income, the higher prices are paid for some art works. This means that the art market will benefit not only if less people have more money but also if more people have no money. This also means that increasing the amount of zero incomes is likely, especially under current circumstances, to raise the price of some art works.”

 

…More http://dismagazine.com/disillusioned-2/62143/hito-steyerl-politics-of-post-representation/